| Title |
Real-time video counselling for smoking cessation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012659.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Flora Tzelepis, Christine L Paul, Christopher M Williams, Conor Gilligan, Tim Regan, Justine Daly, Rebecca K Hodder, Emma Byrnes, Judith Byaruhanga, Tameka McFadyen, John Wiggers |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
| France | 2 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 9% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Israel | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 77% |
| Scientists | 4 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 65 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 20% |
| Psychology | 21 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 73 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,793,727
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,048
of 12,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,179
of 365,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.