| Title |
Adductor canal blocks for postoperative pain treatment in adults undergoing knee surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012262.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander Schnabel, Sylvia U Reichl, Stephanie Weibel, Peter K Zahn, Peter Kranke, Esther Pogatzki-Zahn, Christine H Meyer-Frießem |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 33% |
| Canada | 5 | 9% |
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| Belgium | 3 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 12% |
| Scientists | 6 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 64 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 73 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2023.
All research outputs
#984,314
of 24,696,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,023
of 12,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,028
of 368,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,696,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.