| Title |
Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004659.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lelia Duley, Shireen Meher, Kylie E Hunter, Anna Lene Seidler, Lisa M Askie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 24% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Brazil | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Yemen | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 14% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 554 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 551 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 79 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 9% |
| Researcher | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 98 | 18% |
| Unknown | 210 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 189 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 59 | 11% |
| Unknown | 217 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#633,408
of 24,955,994 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,186
of 13,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,281
of 369,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,955,994 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.