↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intra-pleural fibrinolytic therapy versus placebo, or a different fibrinolytic agent, in the treatment of adult parapneumonic effusions and empyema

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Intra-pleural fibrinolytic therapy versus placebo, or a different fibrinolytic agent, in the treatment of adult parapneumonic effusions and empyema
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002312.pub4
Authors

Emile S Altmann, Iain Crossingham, Stephen Wilson, Huw R Davies

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 28 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 34 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,694,603
of 16,227,949 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,826
of 11,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,806
of 330,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,227,949 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.