| Title |
Intra-pleural fibrinolytic therapy versus placebo, or a different fibrinolytic agent, in the treatment of adult parapneumonic effusions and empyema
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002312.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emile S Altmann, Iain Crossingham, Stephen Wilson, Huw R Davies |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 18% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 73 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 81 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,634,886
of 24,614,554 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,115
of 12,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,230
of 368,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,614,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.