↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Community pharmacy personnel interventions for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
Community pharmacy personnel interventions for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003698.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin V Carson-Chahhoud, Jonathan Livingstone-Banks, Kelsey J Sharrad, Zoe Kopsaftis, Malcolm P Brinn, Rachada To-A-Nan, Christine M Bond

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 186 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Other 11 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 88 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 91 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,262,848
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,479
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,868
of 381,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.