Title |
Early enteral nutrition (within 48 hours) versus delayed enteral nutrition (after 48 hours) with or without supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012340.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paulina Fuentes Padilla, Gabriel Martínez, Robin Wm Vernooij, Gerard Urrútia, Marta Roqué I Figuls, Xavier Bonfill Cosp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 22% |
United States | 2 | 7% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
Argentina | 1 | 4% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 30% |
Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 283 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 37 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
Researcher | 21 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 5% |
Other | 39 | 14% |
Unknown | 125 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
Other | 25 | 9% |
Unknown | 143 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,353,176
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,878
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,483
of 377,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.