↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early enteral nutrition (within 48 hours) versus delayed enteral nutrition (after 48 hours) with or without supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
287 Mendeley
Title
Early enteral nutrition (within 48 hours) versus delayed enteral nutrition (after 48 hours) with or without supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012340.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulina Fuentes Padilla, Gabriel Martínez, Robin Wm Vernooij, Gerard Urrútia, Marta Roqué I Figuls, Xavier Bonfill Cosp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 287 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Researcher 21 7%
Other 15 5%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 125 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 13%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Unspecified 4 1%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 143 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,353,176
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,878
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,483
of 377,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.