↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 13,156)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2051 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002929.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Vincent, Peggy Edwards

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,051 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 12%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 80 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 93 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1723. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,137
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62
of 312,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.