Title |
Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002929.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marina Vincent, Peggy Edwards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,054 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 262 | 13% |
Japan | 107 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 98 | 5% |
Canada | 59 | 3% |
Germany | 48 | 2% |
Spain | 26 | 1% |
France | 20 | <1% |
Chile | 14 | <1% |
Australia | 10 | <1% |
Other | 113 | 6% |
Unknown | 1297 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1889 | 92% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 82 | 4% |
Scientists | 51 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 22 | 1% |
Unknown | 10 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 205 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
Researcher | 21 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
Other | 34 | 17% |
Unknown | 80 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 9% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
Engineering | 5 | 2% |
Other | 25 | 12% |
Unknown | 93 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1729. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,179
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62
of 313,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.