The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Antidotes for acute cardenolide (cardiac glycoside) poisoning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005490.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darren M Roberts, Nick Buckley |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 25% |
| Unknown | 29 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2015.
All research outputs
#8,850,931
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,772
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,314
of 86,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.