↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006460.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tianjing Li, Riaz Qureshi, Kate Taylor

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Researcher 12 11%
Other 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Psychology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 29 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,238,618
of 17,375,479 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,719
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,285
of 335,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,375,479 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.