↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Human milk-derived fortifier versus bovine milk-derived fortifier for prevention of mortality and morbidity in preterm neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
104 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Human milk-derived fortifier versus bovine milk-derived fortifier for prevention of mortality and morbidity in preterm neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013145.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muralidhar H Premkumar, Mohan Pammi, Gautham Suresh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Master 14 10%
Researcher 13 9%
Unspecified 8 6%
Other 34 24%
Unknown 43 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Unspecified 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 49 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2022.
All research outputs
#434,888
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#790
of 12,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,822
of 365,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.