↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hawthorn extract for treating chronic heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
44 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Hawthorn extract for treating chronic heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005312.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruoling Guo, Max H Pittler, Edzard Ernst

Abstract

Hawthorn extract is advocated as an oral treatment option for chronic heart failure. Also, the German Commission E approved the use of extracts of hawthorn leaf with flower in patients suffering from heart failure graded stage II according to the New York Heart Association.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 202 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 63 30%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 8%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 39 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#501,235
of 21,735,696 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#992
of 12,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,283
of 143,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,735,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.