The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Exercise interventions for shoulder dysfunction in patients treated for head and neck cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008693.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alan PV Carvalho, Flávia MR Vital, Bernardo GO Soares |
Abstract |
Shoulder dysfunction is a common problem in patients treated for head and neck cancer. Both neck dissections and radiotherapy can cause morbidity to the shoulder joint. Exercise interventions have been suggested as a treatment option for this population. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
United States | 2 | 25% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
Philippines | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 341 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 54 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 44 | 13% |
Researcher | 34 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 8% |
Other | 18 | 5% |
Other | 59 | 17% |
Unknown | 109 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 16% |
Sports and Recreations | 19 | 6% |
Psychology | 12 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
Other | 31 | 9% |
Unknown | 116 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,599,710
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,870
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,824
of 174,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.