↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in children (published trials only)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in children (published trials only)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002744.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kay Wang, Matthew Shun‐Shin, Peter Gill, Rafael Perera, Anthony Harnden

Abstract

During epidemics, influenza attack rates in children may exceed 40%. Options for prevention and treatment currently include the neuraminidase inhibitors zanamivir and oseltamivir. Laninamivir octanoate, the prodrug of laninamivir, is currently being developed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 174 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 17%
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Researcher 18 10%
Other 10 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 57 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,887,154
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,910
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,447
of 175,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.