↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anaesthesia for evacuation of incomplete miscarriage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
Title
Anaesthesia for evacuation of incomplete miscarriage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008681.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Andres Calvache, Mario F Delgado‐Noguera, Emmanuel Lesaffre, Robert J Stolker

Abstract

An incomplete miscarriage occurs when all the products of conception are not expelled through the cervix. Curettage or vacuum aspiration have been used to remove retained tissues. The anaesthetic techniques used to facilitate this procedure have not been systematically evaluated in order to determine which provide better outcomes to the patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 195 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 11%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Other 15 8%
Other 45 23%
Unknown 60 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Psychology 9 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 66 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,388
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,013
of 174,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.