↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Local anaesthetic nerve block for pain management in labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Local anaesthetic nerve block for pain management in labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009200.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalia Novikova, Catherine Cluver

Abstract

Local anaesthetic nerve block is an important modality for pain management in labour. Pudendal and paracervical block (PCB) are most commonly performed local anaesthetic nerve blocks which have been used for decades.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 142 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 21%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Psychology 12 8%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 27 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,451,001
of 18,187,474 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,808
of 11,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,571
of 134,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,187,474 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.