↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for restoring patency of occluded central venous catheter lumens

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for restoring patency of occluded central venous catheter lumens
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007119.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare van Miert, Rebecca Hill, Leanne Jones

Abstract

Central venous catheters (CVCs) facilitate the administration of intravenous drugs, fluids, blood products and parenteral nutrition to patients with either chronic disease or critical illness. Despite a pivotal role within medical management, a common complication associated with CVC use is occlusion of the CVC lumen(s). CVC occlusion can interrupt and cause serious delays in administration of treatment interventions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 112 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 22%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 33 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,282,150
of 15,190,983 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,011
of 11,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,593
of 126,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,190,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.