↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for restoring patency of occluded central venous catheter lumens

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for restoring patency of occluded central venous catheter lumens
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007119.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare van Miert, Rebecca Hill, Leanne Jones

Abstract

Central venous catheters (CVCs) facilitate the administration of intravenous drugs, fluids, blood products and parenteral nutrition to patients with either chronic disease or critical illness. Despite a pivotal role within medical management, a common complication associated with CVC use is occlusion of the CVC lumen(s). CVC occlusion can interrupt and cause serious delays in administration of treatment interventions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 18%
Student > Master 16 11%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 42 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Psychology 6 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 46 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,393,932
of 21,332,163 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,293
of 12,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,793
of 141,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,332,163 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.