↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Modifications of the Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre for posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
Title
Modifications of the Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre for posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008675.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

William T Hunt, Eleanor F Zimmermann, Malcolm P Hilton

Abstract

Benign paroxsymal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a syndrome characterised by short-lived episodes of vertigo associated with rapid changes in head position. It is a common cause of vertigo presenting to primary care and specialist otolaryngology (ENT) clinics. BPPV of the posterior canal is a specific type of BPPV for which the Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre is a verified treatment. A range of modifications of the Epley manoeuvre are used in clinical practice, including post-Epley vestibular exercises and post-Epley postural restrictions.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 317 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 21%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Researcher 31 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 9%
Other 24 7%
Other 70 21%
Unknown 60 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 12%
Psychology 14 4%
Sports and Recreations 11 3%
Neuroscience 11 3%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 74 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,117,865
of 24,021,239 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,620
of 12,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,693
of 164,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,021,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.