↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Xiao Chai Hu Tang, a herbal medicine, for chronic hepatitis B

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Xiao Chai Hu Tang, a herbal medicine, for chronic hepatitis B
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013090.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

De Zhao Kong, Ning Liang, Guan Lin Yang, Zhe Zhang, Yue Liu, Jing Li, Xuehan Liu, Shibing Liang, Dimitrinka Nikolova, Janus C Jakobsen, Christian Gluud, Jian Ping Liu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 26 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#9,821,901
of 16,650,712 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,516
of 11,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,926
of 397,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,650,712 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.