| Title |
Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012487.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharon P Parry, Pieter Coenen, Nipun Shrestha, Peter B O'Sullivan, Christopher G Maher, Leon M Straker |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 9 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 5 | 5% |
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| Finland | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 68% |
| Scientists | 15 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 462 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 462 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 10% |
| Researcher | 38 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 32 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 95 | 21% |
| Unknown | 165 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 36 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 4% |
| Engineering | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 66 | 14% |
| Unknown | 190 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#687,895
of 24,273,038 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,326
of 12,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,785
of 464,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,273,038 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.