↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
82 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
512 Mendeley
Title
Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012487.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon P Parry, Pieter Coenen, Nipun Shrestha, Peter B O'Sullivan, Christopher G Maher, Leon M Straker

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 512 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 512 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 11%
Student > Bachelor 51 10%
Researcher 41 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 4%
Other 78 15%
Unknown 226 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 64 13%
Sports and Recreations 20 4%
Engineering 13 3%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Other 65 13%
Unknown 256 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#920,097
of 26,473,472 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,654
of 13,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,322
of 482,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,473,472 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.