↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Follow-up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Follow-up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012425.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beverley L Høeg, Pernille E Bidstrup, Randi V Karlsen, Anne Sofie Friberg, Vanna Albieri, Susanne O Dalton, Lena Saltbaek, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Trine Allerslev Horsboel, Christoffer Johansen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 19%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 40 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,308,552
of 17,027,788 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,398
of 11,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,864
of 400,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,027,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.