| Title |
Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012425.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beverley L Høeg, Pernille E Bidstrup, Randi V Karlsen, Anne Sofie Friberg, Vanna Albieri, Susanne O Dalton, Lena Saltbæk, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Trine Allerslev Horsboel, Christoffer Johansen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 265 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 11% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 19% |
| Unknown | 109 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 13% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 119 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,453,297
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,130
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,485
of 476,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.