↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Follow-up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
Title
Follow-up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012425.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beverley L Høeg, Pernille E Bidstrup, Randi V Karlsen, Anne Sofie Friberg, Vanna Albieri, Susanne O Dalton, Lena Saltbaek, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Trine Allerslev Horsboel, Christoffer Johansen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 193 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 12%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Other 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 65 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 16%
Psychology 10 5%
Unspecified 10 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 74 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,401,155
of 21,340,902 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,309
of 12,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,617
of 435,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,340,902 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.