↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Angiotensin receptor blockers for heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Angiotensin receptor blockers for heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003040.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Balraj S Heran, Vijaya M Musini, Ken Bassett, Rod S Taylor, James M Wright

Abstract

Chronic heart failure (HF) is a prevalent world-wide. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely prescribed for chronic HF although their role is controversial.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 204 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 12 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 11 5%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 93 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 96 47%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,731,747
of 17,790,494 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,199
of 11,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,752
of 133,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,790,494 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.