↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for promoting physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
488 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
656 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for promoting physical activity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003180.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles Foster, Melvyn Hillsdon, Margaret Thorogood, Asha Kaur, Thamindu Wedatilake

Abstract

Little is known about the effectiveness of strategies to enable people to achieve an increase in their physical activity.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 656 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 17 3%
United States 9 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 611 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 122 19%
Researcher 99 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 99 15%
Student > Bachelor 76 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 6%
Other 146 22%
Unknown 75 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 188 29%
Sports and Recreations 77 12%
Psychology 74 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 10%
Social Sciences 63 10%
Other 77 12%
Unknown 111 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#962,535
of 17,363,630 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,528
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,007
of 132,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,363,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.