↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for promoting physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
538 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
744 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for promoting physical activity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003180.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles Foster, Melvyn Hillsdon, Margaret Thorogood, Asha Kaur, Thamindu Wedatilake

Abstract

Little is known about the effectiveness of strategies to enable people to achieve an increase in their physical activity.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 744 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 17 2%
United States 9 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 700 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 136 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 15%
Researcher 98 13%
Student > Bachelor 83 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 6%
Other 163 22%
Unknown 112 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 198 27%
Sports and Recreations 82 11%
Psychology 76 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 74 10%
Social Sciences 70 9%
Other 91 12%
Unknown 153 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,009,512
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,219
of 12,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,031
of 142,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.