↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Comparison of different human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine types and dose schedules for prevention of HPV-related disease in females and males

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
83 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of different human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine types and dose schedules for prevention of HPV-related disease in females and males
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013479
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanna Bergman, Brian S Buckley, Gemma Villanueva, Jennifer Petkovic, Chantelle Garritty, Vittoria Lutje, Alina Ximena Riveros-Balta, Nicola Low, Nicholas Henschke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 298 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 14%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 92 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 106 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2021.
All research outputs
#205,698
of 17,809,310 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#401
of 11,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,190
of 406,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,809,310 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.