↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Animal-assisted therapy for dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
31 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
Title
Animal-assisted therapy for dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013243.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nai Ming Lai, Sharon Mei Wern Chang, Siok Shen Ng, Shir Ley Tan, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Fiona Stanaway

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 235 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 15%
Student > Master 35 15%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 68 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 46 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 18%
Psychology 26 11%
Social Sciences 15 6%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 72 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#663,743
of 17,654,026 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,655
of 11,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,807
of 405,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,654,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.