↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Animal‐assisted therapy for dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
33 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
493 Mendeley
Title
Animal‐assisted therapy for dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013243.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nai Ming Lai, Sharon Mei Wern Chang, Siok Shen Ng, Shir Ley Tan, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Fiona Stanaway

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 493 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 493 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 12%
Student > Master 49 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 8%
Researcher 39 8%
Student > Postgraduate 19 4%
Other 67 14%
Unknown 217 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 72 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 66 13%
Psychology 43 9%
Social Sciences 17 3%
Sports and Recreations 7 1%
Other 59 12%
Unknown 229 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,011,940
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,999
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,064
of 480,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.