↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
123 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
Title
Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011284.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill A Hayden, Maria N Wilson, Richard D Riley, Ross Iles, Tamar Pincus, Rachel Ogilvie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 123 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 328 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 15%
Student > Bachelor 45 14%
Researcher 27 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Other 18 5%
Other 54 16%
Unknown 112 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 16%
Psychology 14 4%
Sports and Recreations 11 3%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 126 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#379,528
of 22,474,238 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#702
of 12,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,143
of 442,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,474,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.