↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
132 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011284.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill A Hayden, Maria N Wilson, Richard D Riley, Ross Iles, Tamar Pincus, Rachel Ogilvie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 199 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 18%
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 49 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 16%
Sports and Recreations 11 5%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 61 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2021.
All research outputs
#272,083
of 17,993,131 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#545
of 11,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,510
of 408,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,993,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.