↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non‐specific low back pain: prognostic factor review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
109 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
447 Mendeley
Title
Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non‐specific low back pain: prognostic factor review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011284.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill A Hayden, Maria N Wilson, Richard D Riley, Ross Iles, Tamar Pincus, Rachel Ogilvie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 446 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 13%
Student > Bachelor 49 11%
Researcher 34 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 6%
Other 24 5%
Other 68 15%
Unknown 185 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 13%
Psychology 16 4%
Sports and Recreations 13 3%
Social Sciences 10 2%
Other 52 12%
Unknown 204 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#543,766
of 25,941,588 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#915
of 13,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,822
of 480,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,941,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.