| Title |
Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011284.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jill A Hayden, Maria N Wilson, Richard D Riley, Ross Iles, Tamar Pincus, Rachel Ogilvie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 16% |
| Germany | 16 | 13% |
| Canada | 8 | 6% |
| United States | 7 | 6% |
| Australia | 6 | 5% |
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 89 | 71% |
| Scientists | 23 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 412 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 12% |
| Researcher | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 67 | 16% |
| Unknown | 157 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 14% |
| Psychology | 15 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 49 | 12% |
| Unknown | 175 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#441,388
of 24,803,011 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#796
of 12,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,547
of 470,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,803,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.