| Title |
Transition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009794.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Campbell, Katie Biggs, Susie K Aldiss, Philip M O'Neill, Mark Clowes, Janet McDonagh, Alison While, Faith Gibson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 32% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 78% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 168 | 15% |
| Researcher | 127 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 114 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 110 | 10% |
| Other | 71 | 6% |
| Other | 240 | 21% |
| Unknown | 319 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 287 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 207 | 18% |
| Psychology | 82 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 52 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 135 | 12% |
| Unknown | 368 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#983,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,942
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,833
of 315,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.