↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Higher versus lower fraction of inspired oxygen or targets of arterial oxygenation for adults admitted to the intensive care unit

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Higher versus lower fraction of inspired oxygen or targets of arterial oxygenation for adults admitted to the intensive care unit
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012631.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marija Barbateskovic, Olav L Schjørring, Sara Russo Krauss, Janus C Jakobsen, Christian S Meyhoff, Rikke M Dahl, Bodil S Rasmussen, Anders Perner, Jørn Wetterslev

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 40 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 55 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,542,018
of 18,144,179 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,807
of 11,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,235
of 409,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,144,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.