↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Expectant care versus surgical treatment for miscarriage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
Title
Expectant care versus surgical treatment for miscarriage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003518.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kavita Nanda, Laureen M Lopez, David A Grimes, Alessandra Peloggia, Geeta Nanda

Abstract

Miscarriage is a common complication of early pregnancy that can have both medical and psychological consequences such as depression and anxiety. The need for routine surgical evacuation with miscarriage has been questioned because of potential complications such as cervical trauma, uterine perforation, hemorrhage, or infection.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 360 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 16%
Student > Master 52 14%
Researcher 32 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 9%
Student > Postgraduate 28 8%
Other 79 22%
Unknown 83 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 9%
Psychology 32 9%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 90 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,947,034
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,290
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,903
of 156,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.