↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Expectant care versus surgical treatment for miscarriage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
Title
Expectant care versus surgical treatment for miscarriage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003518.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kavita Nanda, Laureen M Lopez, David A Grimes, Alessandra Peloggia, Geeta Nanda

Abstract

Miscarriage is a common complication of early pregnancy that can have both medical and psychological consequences such as depression and anxiety. The need for routine surgical evacuation with miscarriage has been questioned because of potential complications such as cervical trauma, uterine perforation, hemorrhage, or infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 366 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 16%
Student > Master 51 14%
Researcher 32 9%
Student > Postgraduate 30 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 8%
Other 77 21%
Unknown 92 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 147 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 9%
Psychology 29 8%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 37 10%
Unknown 101 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,369,313
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,887
of 12,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,572
of 165,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.