↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

​Primary closure versus delayed or no closure for traumatic wounds due to mammalian bite

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
​Primary closure versus delayed or no closure for traumatic wounds due to mammalian bite
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011822.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Richard Kirubakaran, Sirshendu Chaudhuri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 178 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 11 6%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 69 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Psychology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 2%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 75 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,316,004
of 25,981,448 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,643
of 13,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,766
of 480,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,981,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.