The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Primary closure versus delayed or no closure for traumatic wounds due to mammalian bite
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011822.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Richard Kirubakaran, Sirshendu Chaudhuri |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 15% |
| India | 2 | 10% |
| France | 2 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 25% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 187 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 72 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 79 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,295,021
of 26,385,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,569
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,808
of 483,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,385,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.