↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

​Primary closure versus delayed or no closure for traumatic wounds due to mammalian bite

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
​Primary closure versus delayed or no closure for traumatic wounds due to mammalian bite
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011822.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Richard Kirubakaran, Sirshendu Chaudhuri

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 41 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Unspecified 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 45 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,505,372
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,437
of 12,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,436
of 456,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.