↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Video feedback for parental sensitivity and attachment security in children under five years

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
434 Mendeley
Title
Video feedback for parental sensitivity and attachment security in children under five years
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012348.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leeanne O'Hara, Emily R Smith, Jane Barlow, Nuala Livingstone, Nadeeja Ins Herath, Yinghui Wei, Thees Frerich Spreckelsen, Geraldine Macdonald

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 434 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 434 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 9%
Student > Bachelor 40 9%
Researcher 38 9%
Other 22 5%
Other 61 14%
Unknown 179 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 11%
Social Sciences 23 5%
Neuroscience 5 1%
Other 36 8%
Unknown 201 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,276,053
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,774
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,380
of 479,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.