↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Video feedback for parental sensitivity and attachment security in children under five years

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Video feedback for parental sensitivity and attachment security in children under five years
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012348.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leeanne O'Hara, Emily R Smith, Jane Barlow, Nuala Livingstone, Nadeeja INS Herath, Yinghui Wei, Thees Frerich Spreckelsen, Geraldine Macdonald

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 250 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 16%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 75 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 18%
Psychology 43 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 10%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 90 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,780,883
of 18,034,577 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,324
of 11,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,217
of 405,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,034,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.