↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strength training and aerobic exercise training for muscle disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
Title
Strength training and aerobic exercise training for muscle disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003907.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicoline BM Voet, Elly L van der Kooi, Baziel GM van Engelen, Alexander CH Geurts

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 358 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 19%
Student > Bachelor 43 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 11%
Researcher 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 64 18%
Unknown 93 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 19%
Sports and Recreations 40 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 103 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,181,774
of 17,508,799 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,064
of 11,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,164
of 401,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,508,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.