The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Strength training and aerobic exercise training for muscle disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003907.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicoline Bm Voet, Elly L van der Kooi, Baziel Gm van Engelen, Alexander Ch Geurts |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 617 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 613 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 92 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 77 | 12% |
| Researcher | 41 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 5% |
| Other | 97 | 16% |
| Unknown | 239 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 122 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 88 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 52 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 67 | 11% |
| Unknown | 259 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,346,408
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,733
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,749
of 479,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.