↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011588.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver Ng, Barrie D Keeler, Amitabh Mishra, J A Simpson, Keith Neal, Hafid Omar Al-Hassi, Matthew J Brookes, Austin G Acheson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 221 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 12 5%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 70 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Unspecified 6 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 76 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,112,807
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,512
of 12,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,737
of 457,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.