↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011588.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver Ng, Barrie D Keeler, Amitabh Mishra, J A Simpson, Keith Neal, Hafid Omar Al-Hassi, Matthew J Brookes, Austin G Acheson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 146 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Master 18 12%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 30 21%
Unknown 41 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Computer Science 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 45 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,096,282
of 17,824,880 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,818
of 11,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,906
of 402,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,824,880 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.