↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
16 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
Title
Iron therapy for preoperative anaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011588.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver Ng, Barrie D Keeler, Amitabh Mishra, J A Simpson, Keith Neal, Hafid Omar Al-Hassi, Matthew J Brookes, Austin G Acheson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 276 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 13 5%
Other 61 22%
Unknown 107 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 6%
Unspecified 11 4%
Psychology 6 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 113 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,325,312
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,821
of 11,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,623
of 473,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.