↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002239.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jawad Freites, Fiona Stewart, Muhammad Imran Omar, Atefeh Mashayekhi, Wael I Agur

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 176 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 11 6%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 60 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Psychology 5 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 62 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,896,120
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,022
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,950
of 481,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.