↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Shortened treatment regimens versus the standard regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
Title
Shortened treatment regimens versus the standard regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012918.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angeline G Grace, Abhenil Mittal, Siddharth Jain, Jaya P Tripathy, Srinath Satyanarayana, Prathap Tharyan, Richard Kirubakaran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 344 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 12%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Researcher 34 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 8%
Other 21 6%
Other 63 18%
Unknown 120 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 2%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 135 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,470,303
of 23,668,780 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,353
of 12,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,890
of 462,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,668,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.