| Title |
Shortened treatment regimens versus the standard regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012918.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angeline G Grace, Abhenil Mittal, Siddharth Jain, Jaya P Tripathy, Srinath Satyanarayana, Prathap Tharyan, Richard Kirubakaran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 368 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Researcher | 34 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 17% |
| Unknown | 125 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 19 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 15% |
| Unknown | 141 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,470,303
of 23,668,780 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,353
of 12,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,890
of 462,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,668,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.