↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Shortened treatment regimens versus the standard regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
Title
Shortened treatment regimens versus the standard regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012918.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angeline G Grace, Abhenil Mittal, Siddharth Jain, Jaya P Tripathy, Srinath Satyanarayana, Prathap Tharyan, Richard Kirubakaran

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 378 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 11%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Researcher 37 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 7%
Other 23 6%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 138 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 2%
Other 59 16%
Unknown 154 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,737,102
of 26,329,759 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,519
of 13,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,512
of 485,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,329,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.