↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Shortened treatment regimens versus the standard regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Shortened treatment regimens versus the standard regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012918.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angeline G Grace, Abhenil Mittal, Siddharth Jain, Jaya P Tripathy, Srinath Satyanarayana, Prathap Tharyan, Richard Kirubakaran

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 183 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 42 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 52 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,489,093
of 18,702,874 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,640
of 11,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,484
of 408,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,702,874 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.