↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacological treatment for Kleine-Levin syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

5 tweeters
3 Facebook pages
1 Wikipedia page


16 Dimensions

Readers on

137 Mendeley
Pharmacological treatment for Kleine-Levin syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006685.pub4
Pubmed ID

Marcio M de Oliveira, Cristiane Conti, Gilmar F Prado


This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review, published in 2009, Issue 2.Kleine-Levin syndrome (KLS) is a rare disorder that mainly affects adolescent men. It is characterised by recurrent episodes of hypersomnia, usually accompanied by hyperphagia, cognitive and mood disturbances, abnormal behaviour, such as hypersexuality, and signs of dysautonomia.In 1990, the diagnostic criteria for Kleine-Levin syndrome were modified in the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, where KLS was defined as a syndrome comprised of recurring episodes of undue sleepiness lasting some days, which may or may not be associated with hyperphagia and abnormal behaviour. According to the International Classification of Sleepiness Disorders, 3rd version (ICSD-3), revised in 2014, the Kleine-Levin syndrome is a disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of hypersomnia that last from two days to four weeks, with at least annual recurrence, and hyperphagia (rapid consumption of a large amount of food), usually with onset in early adolescence in males but occasionally in later life and in women. A monosymptomatic form of the disorder with hypersomnia only can occur without binge eating or hypersexuality.The cause of Kleine-Levin syndrome remains unknown, and several treatment strategies have been used. Some medications have been reported to provide benefit in the treatment of patients with KLS, but because of the rarity of the condition, no long-term follow-up therapies have yet been described. This review aimed to evaluate:1. whether pharmacological treatment for Kleine Levin syndrome was effective and safe.2. which drug or category of drugs was effective and safe. For the latest update, we searched the following sources: the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (7 April 2016); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Cochrane Register of Studies Online CRSO (7 April 2016); MEDLINE (1946 to April 2016); LILACS (7 April 2016); ClinicalTrials.gov (7 April 2016); WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ICTRP (7 April 2016); reference lists of sleep medicine textbooks; review articles and reference lists of articles identified by the search strategies. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised controlled trials looking at pharmacological interventions for Kleine-Levin syndrome were eligible. We had planned to include both parallel-group and cross-over studies. Two review authors (MMO and CC) had planned to extract the data reported in the original articles. No studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Therapeutic trials of pharmacological treatment for Kleine-Levin syndrome with a double-blind, placebo-controlled design are needed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 20%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 35%
Psychology 22 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 29 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2019.
All research outputs
of 14,504,773 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 10,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 263,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,504,773 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.