↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for giant retinal tear

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for giant retinal tear
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012646.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Gutierrez, Jose L Rodriguez, Diego Zamora-de La Cruz, Mariana Aracely Flores Pimentel, Aida Jimenez-Corona, Linda C Novak, Rene Cano Hidalgo, Federico Graue

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 27 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 29%
Unspecified 13 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 34 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,610,938
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,448
of 12,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,103
of 458,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.