↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatments for preventing recurrence of infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
Treatments for preventing recurrence of infection with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> in people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012300.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally Palser, Sherie Smith, Edward F Nash, Arnav Agarwal, Alan R Smyth

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 12 6%
Researcher 10 5%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 97 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Psychology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 103 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,545,530
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,655
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,028
of 470,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#122
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.