↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatments for preventing recurrence of infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Treatments for preventing recurrence of infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012300.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally Palser, Sherie Smith, Edward F Nash, Arnav Agarwal, Alan R Smyth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Researcher 9 6%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 48 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 26%
Unspecified 19 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Psychology 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 53 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,132,891
of 21,026,901 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,620
of 12,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,294
of 422,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,026,901 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.