The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Electronic mosquito repellents for preventing mosquito bites and malaria infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005434.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmadali Enayati, Janet Hemingway, Paul Garner |
| Abstract |
Electronic mosquito repellents (EMRs) are marketed to prevent mosquitoes biting and to prevent malaria. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Malawi | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 18% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 17% |
| Engineering | 13 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 20% |
| Unknown | 52 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 141. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#308,063
of 26,203,160 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#507
of 13,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#433
of 88,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,203,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.