↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Beta-blockers for unstable angina

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Beta-blockers for unstable angina
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007050.pub2
Authors

Taixiang Wu, Xiyang Chen, Lei Deng

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,233,360
of 16,427,352 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,926
of 11,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,417
of 381,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,427,352 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.