The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Splenectomy for people with thalassaemia major or intermedia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010517.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akshay Sharma, Manu Easow Mathew, Latika Puri |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 77 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 82 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,855,792
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,773
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,727
of 355,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#144
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.