| Title |
Splenectomy for people with thalassaemia major or intermedia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010517.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akshay Sharma, Manu Easow Mathew, Latika Puri |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 5% |
| Researcher | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 71 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 76 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,572,011
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,396
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,221
of 352,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.