↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous iron therapy for non-anaemic, iron-deficient adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous iron therapy for non-anaemic, iron-deficient adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013084.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lachlan F Miles, Edward Litton, Georgina Imberger, David Story

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 209 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Researcher 14 7%
Other 12 6%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 77 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Unspecified 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 84 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,677,443
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,171
of 12,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,860
of 458,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#113
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.