↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous iron therapy for non-anaemic, iron-deficient adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous iron therapy for non-anaemic, iron-deficient adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013084.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lachlan F Miles, Edward Litton, Georgina Imberger, David Story

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 11 7%
Researcher 9 6%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 51 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 56 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,394,360
of 21,724,962 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,882
of 12,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,758
of 427,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,724,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.