↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Manually‐generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Manually‐generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001174.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomas Pantoja, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Nathalie Colomer, Carla Castañon, Javiera Leniz Martelli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 218 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Researcher 17 8%
Other 12 6%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 88 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 101 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#20,014,336
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,601
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341,968
of 477,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.