↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001174.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomas Pantoja, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Nathalie Colomer, Carla Castañon, Javiera Leniz Martelli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Researcher 14 13%
Other 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 35 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2019.
All research outputs
#9,735,337
of 16,497,003 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,474
of 11,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,769
of 381,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,497,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.