↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacy‐based management for depression in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
78 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacy‐based management for depression in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013299.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Valeska Elli Brown, Nick Walton, Nicholas Meader, Adam Todd, Lisa Ad Webster, Rachel Steele, Stephanie J Sampson, Rachel Churchill, Dean McMillan, Simon Gilbody, David Ekers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 373 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 12%
Student > Bachelor 38 10%
Researcher 34 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 9%
Other 15 4%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 159 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 34 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 6%
Psychology 20 5%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 173 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#873,650
of 26,083,840 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,590
of 13,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,954
of 483,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,083,840 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.