↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013252.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samer Al Said, Samer Alabed, Klaus Kaier, Audrey R Tan, Christoph Bode, Joerg J Meerpohl, Daniel Duerschmied

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 13%
Other 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 79 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 89 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,166,206
of 26,266,075 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,753
of 13,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,972
of 484,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#98
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,266,075 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.