↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post-percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post-percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013252.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samer Al Said, Samer Alabed, Klaus Kaier, Audrey R Tan, Christoph Bode, Joerg J Meerpohl, Daniel Duerschmied

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Other 11 13%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 28 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,084,245
of 17,009,769 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,787
of 11,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,889
of 389,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,009,769 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.