| Title |
Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post‐percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013252.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samer Al Said, Samer Alabed, Klaus Kaier, Audrey R Tan, Christoph Bode, Joerg J Meerpohl, Daniel Duerschmied |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| France | 2 | 13% |
| Japan | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 171 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 74 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 84 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,924,830
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,641
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,784
of 482,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.