↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013056.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Head, Lee-Yee Chong, Mahmood F Bhutta, Peter S Morris, Shyan Vijayasekaran, Martin J Burton, Anne GM Schilder, Christopher G Brennan-Jones

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 187 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Other 12 6%
Researcher 12 6%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 74 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Psychology 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 81 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,020,571
of 20,914,383 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,433
of 12,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,078
of 420,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,914,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.