↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013056.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Head, Lee-Yee Chong, Mahmood F Bhutta, Peter S Morris, Shyan Vijayasekaran, Martin J Burton, Anne Gm Schilder, Christopher G Brennan-Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 290 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Researcher 14 5%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Other 13 4%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 149 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Psychology 6 2%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 158 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,194,568
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,497
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,092
of 478,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.