↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
47 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
Title
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011535.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilie Sbidian, Anna Chaimani, Ignacio Garcia-Doval, Liz Doney, Corinna Dressler, Camille Hua, Carolyn Hughes, Luigi Naldi, Sivem Afach, Laurence Le Cleach

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 195 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 12%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Other 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 51 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 61 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#957,529
of 18,752,310 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,408
of 11,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,303
of 404,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,752,310 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.