↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
34 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
Title
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011535.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilie Sbidian, Anna Chaimani, Sivem Afach, Liz Doney, Corinna Dressler, Camille Hua, Canelle Mazaud, Céline Phan, Carolyn Hughes, Dru Riddle, Luigi Naldi, Ignacio Garcia-Doval, Laurence Le Cleach

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 303 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Master 29 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Other 24 8%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 107 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 125 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,477,741
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,123
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,796
of 480,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.