↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
Title
Topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013055.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Head, Lee-Yee Chong, Mahmood F Bhutta, Peter S Morris, Shyan Vijayasekaran, Martin J Burton, Anne Gm Schilder, Christopher G Brennan-Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 213 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 8 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 4%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 105 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Psychology 6 3%
Chemistry 2 <1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 111 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,301,368
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,782
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,078
of 476,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.